Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.Join Britannica's Publishing Partner Program and our community of experts to gain a global audience for your work!
- Elements of theatrical production
- Space and time
- Aspects of theatrical production
- Systems of production
Systems of production
Since planning, rehearsal, and performance are common to all theatrical productions, the various systems of organizing and conducting these activities provide a useful set of production classifications.
The single performance
Single or limited performance of a presentation, as part of institutional or communal life, has been fairly common throughout the history of the theatre. The Greek city-state (polis), the medieval town, the Japanese temple, and the American high school are but a few of the bodies that have typically sponsored such dramatic performances. The Greek city-state and the medieval town organized their productions in a strikingly similar way, with the municipality exercising control. Until at least the 4th century bce, however, the Athenians presented new plays every year, whereas the medieval townspeople annually reenacted the same plays or variations of them. Yet in both systems many aspects of production were the same from year to year so that, single performance notwithstanding, each individual offering relied upon an established tradition.
This was less true of the Renaissance court masque (an allegorical dramatic performance featuring music and especially dancing), which was also presented only once. Although each production belonged to a tradition of courtly entertainment, masques of the 16th and 17th centuries became increasingly lavish and novel. A court official was responsible for the overall piece, much in the manner of the later theatre manager or entrepreneur. It was he who recommended a dramatic poet to provide the text, hired the actors, made arrangements for stage scenery, and approved the results before offering them to the sovereign. The most fundamental distinction between this kind of production and earlier institutional types is that the masque was devised to the taste and at the will of one person, the monarch or another honoured figure.
The permanent company
The development of a production system depending on a permanent company introduced a new element into theatre—professional virtuosity. The emergence of professional theatre companies was a feature of Renaissance urbanization. Various courts had maintained performers throughout the medieval period, but these were usually musicians or single performers. With the emergence of the town, the theatre company began to appear throughout Italy, France, Germany, England, and Spain, usually consisting of between five and 16 actors who devoted their lives to their craft.
The repertory troupe
Initially, the company was obliged to tour, since neither court nor city could employ full-time professionals. During times of plague or other interdicts against acting or assembly, companies also traveled. As a result, the actors became accustomed to performing in all kinds of places: halls, outdoor platforms, chapels, and village greens. To compensate for the lack of scenery, the actors used a rich array of costumes—some traditional for recurrent characters or situations, some opulent for their own sake. At all times the actors kept a number of plays in their repertoire so that they could either mount a new play at each performance during an extended stay in one place or repeat plays on request. When a troupe finally settled in one city, it continued this mode of presentation, and thus the stock system was born.
Some permanent troupes performed pieces in which each actor portrayed a stock figure. Italian commedia dell’arte and Japanese Kabuki theatre both utilized such types. Molière, though as a dramatist far less rigid in portraying stock types, led a company each of whose members specialized. English and Spanish troupes, however, because of the demands of the plays, used actors who were much more flexible. The English and Spanish playwrights used a much wider range of characters in their episodic plays, and actors were required to play more than one role in productions. Otherwise, the companies had a great deal in common. Actors bought plays from writers, hired any supporting personnel they needed, and took the profits. Usually, the performers worked on a share system, dividing the proceeds among themselves.
The repertory troupe eventually came to be managed by an individual; the actor-manager was in his heyday from the late 18th to the early 20th century. As an employer, he was concerned less with the welfare of the actor and more with the profit he could extract from the public. Gradually, out of this change emerged the stock company and the single-show association. The stock company was an acting troupe usually managed and organized for a limited season to give a number of plays. Sometimes the manager would take the leading roles and engage others in support; otherwise, he would hire all the performers. The major shift in mode of production came when the stock companies stopped presenting plays in repertory and extended the run of a single play. This happened when city populations grew large enough to keep one play running for an indefinite time. At the end of the 17th century, a London play that ran for eight performances was deemed a success. In 1728, however, a production of John Gay’s Beggar’s Opera made theatrical history by running for 62 performances. By the mid-20th century, successful productions might run for several years. In London The Mousetrap, a dramatization of a thriller by Agatha Christie, ran for more than 50 years.
With the extended run there was little need to maintain a company of actors, even for a season. Instead, single-show contracts were negotiated for actors, stage managers, scenic artists, a host of associates, and a theatre. Since a play was to be repeated indefinitely, it was feasible to invest more money in the accoutrements. Out of this system developed the need for an overall supervisor. At first, the manager or actor-manager undertook this task. Later, individuals specializing in this work appeared. As the play acquired commercial importance, the role of the dramatist changed so that by the 20th century the name of the dramatist had become a significant factor in selling a production, as had that of the director in some instances.
The modern repertory company
During the rise of the stock company and single-show system, there continued to exist highly refined examples of the repertory ensemble. The Comédie Fran?aise, originally an amalgamation of two Parisian troupes, has existed since 1680. In opera the repertory system operated on a global basis at the turn of the 21st century, as singers performed their prized roles in a great variety of venues on very short-term contracts. Toward the end of the 19th century, however, a widespread transformation of the acting ensemble and the repertory system it supported occurred throughout Europe. New theatres, devoted to realist staging, were successfully established, and these, in time, became civic theatres supported by the state.
Particularly famous among repertory companies are the Moscow Art Theatre and the Berliner Ensemble; others include the Abbey Theatre of Ireland, the Royal Shakespeare Company of the United Kingdom, and the Théatre National Populaire of France. In Japan, the traditional Kabuki and Noh theatres have been declared national treasures. All of these theatres, because of government subsidy, maintain large staffs of actors, directors, designers, and other artists and craftsmen. Production is continuous. New plays or, more often, revivals of old plays enter the repertoire, while former productions are dropped. The works of major national authors receive regular performance, thus establishing the main lines of tradition for the company. Sometimes these repertory troupes conduct schools for training young people who might then enter the company. Often, they operate a main stage plus one or more small theatres where new and more experimental plays and styles are tried.
Besides these systems of production there are several forms known collectively as alternative theatre and later as third theatre. The impulses for the alternative theatre arose in the mid-1960s from a sense of dissatisfaction with traditional theatre, in terms of both its repertoire and its production methods and hierarchical structures. Known variously as underground, experimental, guerrilla, Off-Broadway (or Off-Off Broadway), or fringe theatre, these nontraditional forms became widespread in the general climate of youthful political involvement throughout the Western world. In the United States, the civil rights movement of the early 1960s and the peace campaigns of the Vietnam War era resulted in the formation of a large number of innovative companies. Notable among these groups were the San Francisco Mime Troupe, Bread and Puppet Theatre, and El Teatro Campesino. The San Francisco Mime Troupe revived commedia dell’arte techniques in their politically motivated street performances. El Teatro Campesino invented the acto in an attempt to create a specifically Chicano (Mexican American) theatre. Many of their early performances took place on the picket lines during the California agricultural workers’ strikes in the 1960s. Later, El Teatro Campesino explored Chicano mythology and history, inventing the mito, a form of ritualized exchange between performers. The debt of the alternative theatre groups to the earlier agitprop groups is immense.
As political ferment diminished in the early 1970s, many of the groups began to explore new directions. Members of the Living Theatre in the United States and the Polish Laboratory Theatre, as well as the Nordisk Teaterlaboratorium in Holstebro, Den., and other groups in North America and Europe, lived cooperatively, shared a common view of life, and sought to reflect that view in their productions. This shared life is superficially reminiscent of the touring troupe, but the endeavour to achieve a company ethos is closer to the religious motive of an earlier day. Feminist theatres arising in the 1970s also experimented with breaking down the assigned roles of writer, designer, and technician. In most cases this idealism was abandoned for pragmatic reasons and as artists discovered their métiers.